Discussion Questions
For readers who have finished St. Ulphia’s Dead.
The questions below contain spoilers.
Contains Spoilers
〰️
Contains Spoilers 〰️
1. What kind of book did you think you were reading at the beginning? When, if ever, did that understanding begin to change?
2. Mirs and Jo approach the island’s mysteries very differently. How does each try to impose order or control on what they encounter? How do those approaches change over the course of the novel?
3. What draws Mirs and Jo toward each other? Do you understand their relationship primarily as love, shared delusion, mutual need, or something else?
4. What relationship does the novel establish between love and death? In what ways do the two become entangled?
5. The characters repeatedly confront beliefs that appear irrational from outside but coherent from within. Does the novel suggest that society itself depends upon shared agreements about reality? How much freedom do people have to reject or remake those agreements?
6. What role does ambiguity play in the novel? Which uncertainties felt productive or meaningful to you, and which, if any, left you wanting firmer answers?
7. How do the alternating perspectives of Mirs and Jo shape your understanding of events? What can readers perceive that the characters cannot—or will not—see about themselves?
8. What function does the Central Medical Compendium serve beyond advancing the plot? How does it reflect the novel’s concerns with classification, authority, observation, and control?
9. What does the novel suggest about culture-bound disorders? Who has the authority to decide whether a belief or behavior is an illness, a cultural practice, or an intelligible response to experience?
10. “The dead never tell the truth about themselves.” What does the final section establish—or refuse to establish—about the villagers’ deaths?